NASA Releases “Definitive Proof” of Moon Landing
I think I made it quite clear that I will never be convinced that man has ever set foot on the moon, so now let me blow the hole open a little wider. I wouldn’t even usually think about writing on this topic, but it has come to my attention that there is a massive campaign to silence anyone who might be silly enough to claim that man never set foot on the moon. Of course, like all the other lies our people are sold, this one is embedded deep in the psyche of everyone around us. Indeed, it’s an uphill battle to enlighten the sheeple, but I will continue to do my part, no matter what the cost. I do not fear negative opinions of myself, I do not fear the threats that accompany what I do, and I do not fear death; should it ever come to that. Instead, I welcome the chance to fight tooth and nail for what is true, what is just, and what is right for the people of the earth. Wherever I find resistance to truth, I will tear down the walls and let the light shine through.
Recently while arguing with some of the paid disinformation retards on youtube (more on this coming up soon), one of them made mention of the recent pictures released by NASA from the LRO or Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, so naturally, I needed to take a look and see what this was all about. It turns out, that NASA’s latest moon probe, which isn’t being violently crashed into the surface, will instead orbit the moon and send back detailed photographs of the moon surface for mapping purposes, among other things. Unfortunately for NASA and all of their shills, at this point, their new photos are going to turn out to be more of an embarrassment than anything else.
While digging around for information about this latest folly, I stumbled across an article on Space.com just published July 17th, and this is what they have to say about the new photos (article here):
For stubborn folks who still believe the Apollo astronauts never landed on the moon, NASA has new images – definitive proof – that clearly show the Apollo 11 lander that carried the first astronauts to the lunar surface 40 years ago.
The images, taken by NASA’s first lunar scout in more than a decade, the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), show the Eagle lunar lander at Tranquility Base, where Apollo 11 astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin landed on July 20, 1969. They were snapped between July 11 and 15 of this month and released by NASA today.
“The LROC team anxiously awaited each image,” said LROC principal investigator Mark Robinson of Arizona State University. “We were very interested in getting our first peek at the lunar module descent stages just for the thrill — and to see how well the cameras had come into focus. Indeed, the images are fantastic and so is the focus.”
So, these images from NASA are supposed to be the “definitive proof” of the moon landing (hoax). What is so sad about this pathetic attempt to appease the masses, and reinforce their programming is as follows. First, almost EVERY article pertaining to these pictures across the internet has some sort of blatant attack on those who don’t believe in this hoax. Let me make it clear that “believing” in anything is for idiots, morons, ignoramus’ etc. Knowing or not knowing is for the rest of us. Second, this “definitive proof” is nothing more than a bunch of grainy, low resolution (despite their claims of fantastic images with excellent focus) images. Third, these images wreak of amateur photoshop tampering.
So, without further a due, here is the latest and greatest from the multi-billion dollar fraud known as NASA, in all their glory, as posted by Space.com:
This little spec has a massive photoshopped shadow. This is definitive proof that NASA is lying, err telling the truth, right?
This grainy photoshopped image is NASA's "definitive proof". You have to be a total moron to accept this fable.
Now, I don’t know about you, but if I were trying to convince someone that man walked on the moon, and I had a multi-billion dollar budget like NASA, I would be sure to first capture better pictures, and second, make the full size images available to anyone and everyone; which Space.com failed to do, all the while claiming this to be the “definitive” answer. My own children could do a better job, and produce more convincing photos than this in under 10 minutes with photoshop. However, if you will head over to this page at NASA’s own website, you can find clickable images that are much larger, one being much darker, and still fail to show anything of value. They damn sure don’t show anything “definitive”.
Next is this article, which is even more demeaning to those who refuse to believe in fairy tales, with it’s title stating “Slaying Lunar Hoax Lunacy”. The photo provided with the article has the caption “Apollo Landing Sites Imaged – DEAL WITH IT!!” Well now, that’s enough to convince me! I give up NASA, you win! I am now totally convinced of the fake moon landing! Yeah right, who do they think they are kidding? I think this is a case of too many slope heads who are missing frontal lobes trying to convince a more intelligent species of their fables, and nothing more.
NASA denies that stars are visible from the surface of the moon with no atmosphere, even though they are visible from earth with it's thick atmosphere. Image courtesy of hollywood, I mean NASA.
What I find most interesting is that NASA and these news outlets actually feel they need to debunk non-believers. The truth is, if this were a real event, they wouldn’t even need to entertain the thoughts of those who refuse to believe. I mean, if it’s assumed to be real by the masses, why bother? When someone puts so much effort into convincing you that a lie is the truth, but fails to ever provide tangible proof; most intelligent people will be naturally inclined towards disbelief. People who speak the truth, and know what they are saying is fact, usually completely refuse to answer absurd accusations, and why should they? Facts are not something to debate. What’s really happening is the hoax of the moon landing is failing as fast as the holohoax and all their other lies. Maybe later I’ll delve into why NASA needs to continue propping up the moon landing fantasy. For now, check out the animosity in the second article:
Now, can the whole ignorance of the lunar hoax conspiracy be laid to rest? No. Even if all the ‘hoaxers’ were transported to the landing sites and had their mugs slammed into the side of the landers they would still deny what they are so divorced from – reality. These new images are only good for those sitting on the fence, the undecided. I am not entirely sure that the hoaxers even believe the nonsense they are spewing. If you do the research you will find every lead nutcase, Sibrel, Kaysing and Rene is pushing some book or movie. It is easy to believe something did not happen when you are collecting royalties…
Does this sound like someone who is upholding credible facts, or does it sound like a typical liar attempting to attack the messengers, rather than refute their message? Why such a violent argument? Why would those who refuse to believe the lies spewed by NASA need their “mugs slammed into the sides of the landers”? Do these morons not realize that this type of argument only tends to substantially weaken their wobbly platform? The truth is, the images are NOT for the “undecided” fence sitters. These images are for the brainwashed masses who might stumble across material that deflates their whole ridiculous story. For those people, these images don’t need to be clear, because the programming is already in place. They will already be inclined to believe what they are told, because they have always trusted what these propaganda outlets spew without question. In short, these images are a FAILED attempt at damage control, but again, I’ll leave it up to the reader to decide whether this is “definitive proof” of a moon landing; or whether it’s definitive proof that NASA is working overtime to keep this 40 year old lie alive. If you want my opinion, it is positively the latter. Just for shits and giggles, I see that Curt Maynard has been busy picking apart NASA’s fables too, and he has an article here showing a satellite photo of a man next to truck as comparison for the shadows in these photos, so be sure to check it out too.
UPDATE:
Apollo 11 Crew: Moon Less Interesting Than Mars
Neil Armstrong spends only ELEVEN SECONDS talking about the moon. Buzzard Aldrin makes absolutely ZERO commentary on the moon, and instead, all the speakers at the convention mentioned in the article above, want Obama to push for manned exploration of Mars instead. Michael Collins, who lies about circling the moon while Armstrong and Aldrin pretended to be walking on it’s surface, also wants the focus squarely on Mars. In the article, these astro-nots consider the moon an “old hat”, but we haven’t been there for 40 years.
They downplay the significance of the moon, and insist NASA would be “bogged down” with trying to get to the moon again. If it was so easy on an ancient rocket with a total of 36KB of memory, why would NASA be “bogged down” doing it today? Astro-nots wouldn’t even have to touch the controls. Computers could land a craft on the moon better than they could dream of doing it. Knowing that cabala is heavily intertwined with the moon landings (Apollo 13 was the Phoenix which “rose from the ashes” after supposed troubles on the “dark side of the moon”), it’s rather funny to see that Aldrin mentions they landed on the moon 66 years after man’s first flight, and would like to see man land on mars 66 years after their faked landing on the moon.
Why is the moon an “old hat”, and if it is, why the hell are people packing auditoriums to hear these liars spew more dishonesty? Did people really want to hear about Mars from man’s first moon explorers, and why would they AVOID talking about the moon? Why would they want to steer conversation and all future efforts towards Mars? The answer is simple, because they never set foot on the moon, and anyone who even ATTEMPTS such a flight now would either die in the radiation of space or, if they actually made it to the moon, they would quickly realize that man had never been there before.
I have two words for NASA, Armstrong, Aldrin, and all the others: EPIC FAIL.
Leave a Reply
History Speaks
“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through...all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself.
For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.” - Marcus Tullius Cicero
On the photo labeled “Apollo 11” showing the massive (by comparison) shadow associated with the LEM, it appears that the Sun, during the time that this photo was taken, is oriented to the East, at approximately 37 degrees or so. Therefore, the Shadow should be running in the opposite direction, to the West.
If you’ll look at the Apollo 11 picture again, there is another anomaly near the center on the right hand edge, there is another “object” with a long shadow. Could this be ANOTHER LEM? They are almost identical.
Apollonian is a Jew piece off shit – I hope you’ll ask around about this motherfucken disinformationist.
Indeed I will. I have no alliance to anyone. Especially considering the fact that most people just want to pat me on the back for all my hard work. Fuck that. I’ll take these jews down on my own if I have to. I am looking into this as we speak.
I had a friend some years ago who was a JPL engineer and project manager. He has since retired, and no longer communicates with me, after I asked too many questions regarding technical details about the “moon landing”
In previous conversations, he told me he was in on executive meetings where the topic of discussion was about a possible “manned Mars mission.”
Seems that the big, huge, un-answerable question they got stuck on was how to protect any human crew from deadly RADIATION. He said they talked about how a “solar flare” erruption, which cannot be predicted, would kill all crew. The only protection would be to have a “safe room” on the craft, that had walls filled with 3 to 4 feet thick, chambered walls of water, or about 1 foot thick lead. Any such “safe room” would make the craft too heavy for launch, thus being the single, huge “unsolvable” problem. He also said, the crew would have between 3 to 4 minutes to get into this “safe room” once a solar flare had taken place. They (JPL engineers and other big honcho’s) seemed to know a lot about the radiation hazards of space, once out from under our earth’s protective shield.
I then asked him how the “astro-nots” avoided any kind of solar disturbance in the 6 or 7 moon landings. He said, “They just got lucky!”
Another NOT discussed factor about a “Mars landing” which was the favorite topic of the liars Armstrong,and crew recently, is the time factor. A trip to Mars, depending upon how the ballistics of using the gravity of other bodies for a slingshot kind of route was, 1.5 years going to; and 3 years return, or vice/versa. These kind of logistics casually bantered about, sound like insanity!
Once those highly paid assholes in positions of leadership and authority step into the black hole of lies, it just gets deeper, and deeper, with no way out.
Finally, in case some don’t know, the Head Liar at JPL in those days was one “Dan Goldin” a jew.
So how do the people on the ISS (International Space Station, orbiting the Earth since years) survive this radiation of “solar flare” eruptions?
There are a couple of different ways. Geosynchronous orbit on the opposite side of the earth is one way, and the other is that they are still within the magnetosphere around the planet. It doesn’t end at our atmosphere, but gets weaker as you get further away. This is why they could only fly to about 350 miles above earth, at which point they could see radiation passing through their eyelids. They can only get so far away…ask em, haha.
You’re right, the Earth’s magnetic field is protective.
Btw, NASA does cover the issue of solar flare radiation on moon missions:
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2005/27jan_solarflares.htm
Quote:
“On the Moon, Cucinotta estimates, an astronaut protected by no more than a space suit would have absorbed about 50 rem of ionizing radiation. That’s enough to cause radiation sickness. “But it would not have been fatal,” he adds.
To die, you’d need to absorb, suddenly, 300 rem or more.
…
Such doses from a solar flare are possible. To wit: the legendary solar storm of August 1972.”
So their basic excuse is that a strong solar flare would be too rare to have hit their moon mission.
I don’t care what their excuse is, it’s obvious they faked the shit, because 40 years later we would be mining the surface if they could actually get there. Why are the estimating radiation on the moon if they had a dozen men on the ground there? Even the way they talk “would not have been”. If it was a real event they would say “it wasn’t fatal”. They wouldn’t have all these faked photos, and they would try to pass off the bullshit above as “definitive proof” either.
The doses at only 350 miles above the earth were too much for them, and they’re admitting they would get sick if they actually went to the moon. They don’t even factor in the long ride there and back basking in solar radiation with their little tin cans. Their excuse is just that…an excuse. Not to mention a very poor excuse also. They know damn well their astroNUTS would be dead before they ever got to the moon. There’s no need to theorize about solar flares, and when a big one might hit their mission. They can’t withstand the radiation just outside of earth’s protective shell, let alone the sustained bombardment they would get on a trip to the moon.
There’s no debate on the topic allowed here. They faked the shit on TV, just like they did the attacks on 911. Most of what people have known their entire lives is a television deception. NASA is a major fraud they’ve used to drain our money to pay for our own enslavement. As for space flight, they have produced almost nothing noteworthy that we couldn’t do here on the ground. It’s a bullshit money pit and nothing more. NASA should be put out of business.
Subverted, in 1978 my Dad took me to see the movie “Capricorn One”, and after the movie was over while we were walking back home, my father said “I don’t want you tell this to anyone else, but I want you to always know the truth about things, so you don’t grow up believing a lie. That movie you just saw was exactly how they faked the Lunar Missions.” And I remember him saying something to the effect like, hoping that nothing happens to the movie producer. My father also told me that the moon rock that they say the astro-nots brought back from the moon, were actual moon rocks that were deposited on the earth millions of years ago and that they got these rocks from operation highjump, a 1946-1947 Antartic Expedition. So although the rocks are from “The Moon” or “A Moon”, they were collected right here on Earth.
Funny also is these GRAIL spacecrafts that NAZA says took 3 months to get to the moon, even though the astro-nots got there in three days. Could this be because the Van-Allen Radiation Belt would fry all the sensors and circuits, so they must loop around the belt and thats why it takes so long? But Humans were obviously able to circumvent this process because our SKIN is just like LEAD SHIELDING right?? Why do you think all the land around AREA 51 has been gobbled up by the US govt over the years? Because AREA 51 is the location of the filming of every lunar non-mission. Wouldn’t want any incriminating photos of Earth landscape looking like Lunar landscape now would we? Seriously, any adult who thinks we still landed on the moon, needs to do more critical thinking. The very logistics involved in landing on an alien planet’s surface and SAFELY lifting off and returning to Earth are, and were extremely risky, and all these astro-nots knew this. Do you know three people who would get on a spaceship to travel to another planet were there is no backup anything, no human support, nothing….knowing that the chances of returning are slim? I don’t. Brave men run into burning buildings to save others, crazy men get in spaceships for a one way trip to another planet and there are no “astronauts” who are “crazy” so to speak. They are mainly the top of their classes acedemicaly, and are stable members of society, not suicidal thrill seekers with nothing to live for. So anyone who thinks that they actually got a dozen of our astro-nots on the moon 6 times with no problems is naive at best.
Here’s the big thing you have to ask yourself. WHY FAKE A MOON LANDING??????? You’ll have to think LONG AND HARD about that one too, because I myself have just had some recent revelations regarding this question. Would they fake it just because they can’t get there? That isn’t good enough reason. Would they fake it because of the cold war? Again, not a good enough reason…..jews on both sides of the cold war playing us like a fiddle. No need to really fake a moon landing to beat their buddies in Russia. There is only one good reason to fake a moon landing, then claim it’s completely unspectacular, and never try to return. Reality is stranger than fiction…….and I don’t want to say too much more at this point, but to keep it short, you would only fake something like this if you had something to hide, and were looking to discourage people from visiting by playing “been there, done that…nothing to see”.
Can you come up with ANY logical reason to fake a moon landing? Hiding something is the only logical answer.
What a government and media coverup the moon landing was; just like was 9/11.
Hi. I agree with you but than why did they fake it? It seems they faked the whole appolo program, why?
I personnaly dont buy the “because of the competition with the soviets”
That’s easy. To funnel literally BILLIONS of dollars into Israel. To allow them to spend BILLIONS on defense programs, FEMA camps, etc. This is why the space program is one of their most highly guarded secrets. It is one of the ways they obtain funds for their black ops projects, etc. Of course, it allows them to further what space technology they are capable of like satellites and spaced based weapon systems too. The idea was simply to get people to accept the money pit known as NASA. The jews in Russia and the USA staged the whole space race, cold war and the animosity between the two countries. At the top, they’re all on the same team.
http://moonpans.com/nss/prints/40_A11easep.htm
The picture in the link is from moonpans.com who sell panoramic posters of moon landing. With the sun that far away from the moon, you would expect the shadows to be parallel, but if you see all the shadows are angled towards the left, while the shadow of the picture take itself is straight. How much more convincing should this be that the landing never happened.
Something else about JPL you may have missed…Jack Parsons and Aleister Crowley
http://www.bariumblues.com/jpl.htm
Ask for an Earth-bound telescope to snap a shot of the nodules. They often claim they can read a newspaper on the moon… that would be a definitive, repeatable, subject to testing approach. It will either be there, or not. And that picture THEY took will serve as excellent comparison. If the craters disposition isn’t the same… bingo!
You hit the nail with your points subverted nation. That’s exactly my point. It has been over 40 years since we went back to the moon, after having been there over 13 times. Did NASA realize that there is nothing there to explore anymore? LOL. It has to do with MONEY. Each and every fake moon landing required actual cost of going to the moon which was BILLIONS of dollars of taxpayers’ money. So, NASA put on a show for the public and made billions while they were at it.
Any times there is a definitive proof about moon landing, they are always fuzzy and dark. If satellites sent to Mars and other planets captured decent images and sometimes High Resolution like the planet Saturn, why can’t NASA send a rover to the surface of our moon in 2 or 3 days and control it in real-time. Why do they have to send orbiter to spin around the moon? Because it is all a lie. They are trying their best to hide it. LOL
Man never landed on the moon. Just read my blog at http://you-me-and-world.blogspot.com.
Guy, what can I say??? You see through the Mooniehoax but you can’t see through the Obomba hoax! Shut up already!
LMAO. These images so called definitive proof are laughable. This is the best you can do, NASA? LOL. My 3 year old child can produce much better and believable definitive proof for an image.
HEY, NASA send a rover or two to our moon and take a picture why don’t you like Mark said. Don’t make yourself look worse than you are. LMAO. Cat is out of the bag, NASA. Now, it is on your shoulder to clearly prove to the world that you did put a man on the moon with solid evidence and I know it will never happen. They will only lie more to hide their lies. LOL.
These days all you hear about is Mars Rising, Mars Landing, etc all over the television – Science Channel, Discovery Channel, Natural Geographic Channel and History Channel. I guess NASA struck a deal with these satellite channels to produce these programs. So, people won’t be asking or thinking about the NASA’s fake moon landings and look forward to new FAKE Mars Landing at the expense of taxpayer’s money LOL. Go Figure.
They will probably use Area 51 again for this new Mars Fake Landing. It makes you think for sure doesn’t it. Why is Area51 so highly guarded? What are they trying to hide from the public? Don’t tell me NASA that its a highly classified projects. Yep, projects that involves faking scientific progress – Moon landings and Mars landings. LOL. I have no doubts that all these lunar modules and space suits “astro-nots” wore are within Area51 not Aliens.
Like their chums over at the CIA, the NASA crowd are a bunch of sexually deviant Satan worshipers. They should all go to FEMA camps for “re-education” by honest, loyal American SANE citizens. Barring that, they should be stuffed in a few of those “space rockets” and sent to their dream planet, Mars. NASA are the biggest, lying, evil, scumbags on Earth. All the “chairs” in the biggest physics departments–all Jews, like that fake Einstein–full of CRAP! If people believe this shit, that’s their problem.
Is this some kind of a joke? NASA releases to the media crystal clear close up photos of craters on the moons around Saturn yet they can’t produce a SINGLE clear close up photo of the moon landing sights for ANY of the Apollo Missions! The photos here are SUCH POOR QUALITY! They look more like acne on a teenagers face than of the moon!
I have researched NASA, science, geology, lunar geology, chemistry, physics, etc.
I’ve come to the conclusion that Apollo was indeed fake and am gathering the evidence now for the big bust. The world needs to know the truth, and they will.
I have some videos now showing some proof that the landings were fake, yet people are still not convinced.
That is why I’m filming an eight part documentary that will explain how it was all done in details. I don’t care about jail or death either, as the world needs to know the truth.
We never went to the moon, it was all a big scam/scheme and there’s nothing NASA A.K.A. the government can do to hide it anymore.
The truth will be revealed…
http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/a-funny-thing-happened-on-the-way-to-the-moon/
Yet, another lie exposed! They raped the taxpayer and laugh right in our faces.
Clearly this website has made a very convincing case that NASA hasn’t gone to the moon… but how do you know for sure that what these people are saying is true? I honestly don’t think that they went to the moon the first time if not the first two, but after that they’ve gone to the moon. I don’t know if you all realize then how much money they spend just to “stage” the entire thing, is it really worth it? Millions of dollars are put forth to launch these spacecrafts that aren’t going to be put to use. How would anyone explain what would be the point in lying about something like that? Would we as Americans get anything accomplished from that? You know people could sue their asses for lying like that… I just don’t see the point, anyone have some reasonable answers?
No. They never, ever set foot on the moon. They’ve never even been close. However, convincing you that they could pull off such a feat has given them DECADES of free funding to further enslave you. People have put a lot of time, energy, and money into NASA and it’s space exploration since they were convinced man could walk on another planet. Some of the purpose is to provide them not only more ways to monitor, propagandize and control you. Just look at what satellites and the internet have allowed them to do. If you’re looking to build a global network of control, it’s nice to have something people are willing to have their money and energy dumped into which can help facilitate that end.
By the way, you can’t sue them for anything. Even if you could get to court with such an purpose, their judges would simply laugh you out of court.
I don’t know, I always assumed the main reason was to come off as the biggest, baddest mofo on the block. Alot of bullies have gotten away with the mere illusion of toughness, so for me that reason was always enough. You seem to think its deeper, and you may just be right, but what? what is the gigantic secret they are hiding, other than the usual, antigravity, zero point energy systems, exotic fuels, exotic craft, awesomely advanced super technology, etc…? or is it bigger and more frightening, do you believe in ET? I do, it’s a simple math thing really so there is no question in my mind that they must exist somewhere in this galaxy, and if they do, how involved are they with us earth humans and are we just some experiment of theirs? What if all those rumors of Eisenhower signing Alien Treaties is true? What if James Forrestal was pushed out his hospital room window because he had found out about ET and couldn’t handle it so they silenced him? I hear it’s the real reason they killed JFK, but I guess you never really know until you know, you know? Bottom line is, there are not enough people globally that are awake yet and the clock is ticking.
Nah, has nothing to do with being the baddest on the block, because every other block is run by the same click. I’ll say this much…..I don’t have beliefs, but I do have enough intelligence to tell when someone is hiding something.
hey dennis – how about the 4 billion dollars in debt-free/non-federal reserve currency kennedy had just issued to the nation? and don’t forget kennedy’s demand that israeli jews come clean about their nuclear ambitions and submit to inspections. your alien angle of assassination is too naive and dissembles away from the perpetrators.
stay on target.
the moon secrets are older and more immense than we can begin to imagine. yes adam, it is because they have something they are hiding about the moon. a precisely placed clockwork in the skies to be observed from the surface of the earth. the deeper purpose?… and who put it there?
when viewed from earth the moon:
-is the exact same size as the sun (the sun is 400 times bigger and 200 times the distance from earth – approximately)
-follows the exact elliptical path of the sun across the sky six-months opposite. tic toc, goes the clock…
-impossibly shows the exact same side towards the earth – in perpetuity – which suggests placement and maintenance.
also the mass of the moon is supposedly such that it would not maintain an orbit around the earth as it does but would either fly off at a tangent or come hurtling toward us.
there’s a lot to mention about the moon but i’ll finish up with this. the jew calendar is a lunar calendar… go figure.
You said it all…same side always facing earth. Why is it everything in our solar system turns on an axis, except the moon? Even the sun spins on it’s axis, but not the moon. If you look at their bogus claims as to WHY it is that we only see one side of the moon, things start to get real fishy. They actually try to say the rate the moon turns on it’s axis is relative to the rotation of the earth in such a way that the earth can never see the other side! If that doesn’t bake your noodle, I don’t know what will. That one point is enough to prove something is seriously wrong with what we’ve been told about this “moon” of ours. I could go much further, but I don’t think I need to. Go find a logical reason as to why we only see one side of a moon which science claims IS IN FACT TURNING on it’s axis.
Venus rotates once every 243 days making its day longer than its year at about 255 days.
Holy SHite!! Ok, Brian, now you really have my gears spinning…..But knowing what we know about the moon and it’s apparent locked, artificial orbit, it only makes my ET argument stronger. I mean, I doubt the DoD is responsible for the orbit of the moon, so if it aint us humans, who else is left? What other explanation could there be for the behavior of the moon? We know there is no way we ever got humans on the moon via rockets, we know about the radiation that killed the Russian dog back in 1957, so we can safely say nothing biological would ever survive past, lets say 2,000 miles out from Earth agreed? Now the question is, WHAT is the main secret that they are hiding regarding the moon other than the fact that they did not land on it when they said they did and probably never have? What is the secret?